MySQL社区

标题: MySQL/MariaDB 安全漏洞 [打印本页]

作者: hm3030    时间: 2012-6-12 09:44
标题: MySQL/MariaDB 安全漏洞
本帖最后由 hm3030 于 2012-6-12 09:50 编辑

We have recently found a serious security bug in MariaDB and MySQL.So, here, we'd like to let you know about what the issue and its impactis. At the end you can find a patch, in case you need to patch an olderunsuported MySQL version.

All MariaDB and MySQL versions up to 5.1.61, 5.2.11, 5.3.5, 5.5.22 arevulnerable.
MariaDB versions from 5.1.62, 5.2.12, 5.3.6, 5.5.23 are not.
MySQL versions from 5.1.63, 5.5.24, 5.6.6 are not.

This issue got assigned an id CVE-2012-2122.

Here's the issue. When a user connects to MariaDB/MySQL, a token (SHAover a password and a random scramble string) is calculated and comparedwith the expected value. Because of incorrect casting, it might'vehappened that the token and the expected value were considered equal,even if the memcmp() returned a non-zero value. In this caseMySQL/MariaDB would think that the password is correct, even while it isnot.  Because the protocol uses random strings, the probability ofhitting this bug is about 1/256.

Which means, if one knows a user name to connect (and "root" almostalways exists), she can connect using *any* password by repeatingconnection attempts. ~300 attempts takes only a fraction of second, sobasically account password protection is as good as nonexistent. Any client will do, there's no need for a special libmysqlclient library.

But practically it's better than it looks - many MySQL/MariaDB buildsare not affected by this bug.

Whether a particular build of MySQL or MariaDB is vulnerable, depends onhow and where it was built. A prerequisite is a memcmp() that can returnan arbitrary integer (outside of -128..127 range). To my knowledge gccbuiltin memcmp is safe, BSD libc memcmp is safe. Linux glibcsse-optimized memcmp is not safe, but gcc usually uses the inlined builtin version.
As far as I know, official vendor MySQL and MariaDB  binaries are notvulnerable.

Regards,
Sergei Golubchik
MariaDB Security Coordinator

References:

MariaDB bug report: https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-212
MariaDB fix: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~maria-captains/maria/5.1/revision/3144

MySQL bug report: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=64884
MySQL fix: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mysql/mysql-server/5.1/revision/3560.10.17
MySQL changelog:  http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/news-5-1-63.html
                              http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/news-5-5-24.html


本文章引用:http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2012/q2/493

可以简单用下面方法测试:
for i in `seq 1 2000`; do mysql -u root --password=bad -h 127.0.0.1 2>/dev/null; done

详细参考: https://community.rapid7.com/community/metasploit/blog/2012/06/11/cve-2012-2122-a-tragically-comedic-security-flaw-in-mysql  








作者: kider    时间: 2012-6-12 14:16
适当的来点中文呗...
作者: squall    时间: 2012-6-12 14:43
进不去吧。5.1和5.5都测试过了。
作者: hm3030    时间: 2012-6-12 15:17
这个安全漏洞只有在自己编译的时使用了优化了的GCC才会出现:Linux glibcsse-optimized memcmp is not safe, but gcc usually uses the inlined builtin version.




欢迎光临 MySQL社区 (http://www.mysqlpub.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.2